User blog comment:Khalael/A Simple Proposition/@comment-25033299-20130427230109/@comment-4608429-20130501195328

I disagree with the idea. I think that it is to easy to discriminate with this system. Prehaps a system of two templates, one for "bad" articals (i.e. contradicts it's self, bad grammar/spelling, ect.) and one for "good" articals (i.e. well thought out idea, good background, an original idea, ect.). Have the "bad" template for those that make you want to claw your eyes out when you read them, and the "good" template for those that go way above the average in terms of material (So it's really really really hard to get).

What do you think about that?