User blog:RemosPendragon/About our canon policy and the 8th edition

As we all know, there has been a few little changes to our 40k universe as we know it since the Gathering Storm -series and the release of 8th edition. I personally don't really approve with it, but I guess it is not my place to question the most canon-wise important releases (rulebooks and codices).

Therefore I suggest some changes on our canon policy.

Changes

 * 1.1 -> There shall be no reborn Primarchs, in addition to Roboute Guilliman
 * 1.2 -> There are 27 Foundings, 27th "Ultima" being the last at the end of M41
 * 1.4 -> There shall be no pre-27th Founding successors of Space Wolves

Thoughts
As far as I have understood, the Primaris Marines are basically the new 1st Founding and those "reinforcements" sent into existing chapters do not share gene-seed with the chapter they are then working... which seems strange. However, my point being, fanon chapter can not have Primaris successor, should it be written down too?

I guess we can keep Red Thirst/Blak Rage in all Blood Angel descendants... don't know about the Primaris Marines' gene-flaws. Maybe this will be 13th/21st all over again. That would be awesome.

I don't have that Dark Millennium book so I really can't check these things in person now.

Point 3.1 could use change of words so that the Ynnari are also free meat here... after year 999.M41 of course.

I guess we all agree with point 6.3, that there shall be no fan-made Eldar gods. Not even if Ynnead has opened his eyes.

Can we finally ban Sensei/Star Child/Illuminati lore for good? I don't honestly believe that stuff will ever be continued to any level.

I think it should also be noted on canon policy page what is our final date. If extended timelines are forbidden, it should be clearly available for everyone to see.

And GEE GW! Where's my Primaris Centurions?!